UBO has been found to be the content blocker which blocks the most with the least breakage (which took into account anti-blockers), see.
Regarding "blocks more ads than uBlock Origin" and "most sites have learned about it & hence easily blacklists": Features - Blocks all ads on all web pages, even on Facebook and YouTube - Blocks malware and tracking - Improves browser performance by removing unwanted content - No 'acceptable' ads or. (For instance, I get avg of 5.6 µs/req for ublock, and avg of 20.5 µs/req for tsurlfilter). With that in mind, uBO's blocking engine is currently the fastest as demonstrated by latest Cliqz's benchmarks, so the "quicker" claim does not hold either. Take control over your digital space and leave ads, malicious websites and.
AdBlocker Ultimate: 604 MB (+362 MB compared to no blocker)ĪdBlocker Ultimate is a extremely dubious fork of AdGuard, with a token GitHub repo where they recreate the repo from scratch regularly so as to disappear previous commit history. Free ad blocker for all browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Edge, etc.) and apps. uBO: 300 MB (+58 MB compared to no blocker). Summing up all the memory used by page and extensions processes, I get: The Extensions process itself is ~36MB with uBO while it is ~113MB with AdBlocker Ultimate. ~16MB with uBO to ~31MB with AdBlocker Ultimate - these were lightweight web pages, expect larger gap for typical pages. Here: Īs seen in the screenshots, AdBlocker Ultimate causes web pages to consume nearly double in memory when compared to uBO, i.e. Found AdBlocker Ulimate quicker, lightweight and blocks more ads than uBlock Origin.
0 kommentar(er)
